Republican party issues on gay marriage

Same-sex marriage has come under scrutiny by some conservative legislators. Idaho legislators began the trend in January when the state House and Senate passed a resolution calling on the Supreme Court to reconsider its decision -- which the court cannot do unless presented with a case on the issue.

In North Dakota, the resolution passed the state House with a vote of and is headed to the Senate. In Montana and Michigan, the bills have yet to face legislative scrutiny. Resolutions have no legal authority and are not binding law, but instead allow legislative bodies to express their collective opinions.

Hodges decision, which established the right to same-sex marriage under the equal protection clause and the due process clause of the 14th Amendment. Some legislators behind the resolutions argue that the legality of gay marriage should be left to states to decide, while others argue that marriage should be reserved for one man and one woman.

Republican state lawmakers galvanize to attack same-sex marriage

In Michigan, state Rep. Josh Schriver unveiled his own anti-gay marriage resolution on Feb. In a press release, he added: "The new resolution urges the preservation of the sanctity of marriage and constitutional protections that ensure freedom of conscience for all Michigan residents. Local Democratic leaders denounced the resolution, arguing that it discriminates against the rights of LGBTQ Americans and distracts from more pressing issues facing Michigan residents.

Mike McFall said. The Michigan resolution has been referred to the Committee on Government Operations and has not yet been put to a vote. The handful of resolutions come after Associate Justice Clarence Thomas expressed interest in revisiting the Obergefell decision in his concurring opinion on the Supreme Court's landmark decision on the Dobbs v.

Jackson Women's Health Organization case that overturned the federal party to abortion. Thomas had issued a dissenting opinion gay against same-sex marriage equality. More than two dozen states have some kind of restriction on same-sex marriage that could be triggered if the Supreme Court one day overturns its decision, according to legislative tracking group Movement Advancement Project.

This is because marriage equality has not yet been codified and enshrined into law nationwide. However, the Respect for Marriage Law signed by former President Joe Biden in guarantees the federal recognition of same-sex and interracial marriages in the event of an overturned Supreme Court decision.

It requires all states to recognize legally certified marriages, even if they were done in a state where it is later banned or done in another marriage entirely. Stream on. Some Republican lawmakers increase calls against gay marriage SCOTUS republican Same-sex marriage has come under scrutiny by some conservative legislators.

By Kiara Alfonseca. Video by Lilia Geho. March 3,PM. Jim Obergefell, the named plaintiff in the Obergefell v. Hodges Supreme Court case that legalized same sex marriage nationwide, is backed by supporters of the courts ruling on same-sex marriage on the step of the Texas Capitol during a rally in Austin, Texas.

MORE: Ballot initiatives protecting marriage equality advancing in some states.